Dashboard Deep Learning Electrical Machines Special machines Linear induction motor (LIM)

Linear induction motor (LIM)

Rotary IM unrolled into a flat plane. v_s = 2·τ·f. Slip + thrust analogs of rotary. End-effect efficiency penalty (60-80%). Applications: maglev (Transrapid, JR-Maglev), urban transit, EMALS, roller coasters.

Junior ~12 min

Step 1 — Linear induction motor: rotary IM unrolled flat

0.55×
v_s slip f

Reference notes

A linear induction motor (LIM) is a rotary induction motor unrolled into a flat plane. The stator becomes a straight rail of laminated iron with 3-φ windings; the rotor becomes a flat conducting sheet that slides along the rail. Use Next → to walk through the construction variants, slip / thrust equations, the end-effect efficiency penalty unique to linear topology, maglev applications, and contrast with the linear synchronous motor (LSM).

How it works

vs = 2 · τ · f

where τ is the pole pitch (distance between adjacent N and S poles, typically 10–30 cm) and f is the supply frequency.

Construction variants

Slip and thrust

s = (vs − v) / vs
F = (3 · V2 · s · R2') / [ωs · ((R1 + R2'/s)2 + (X1 + X2')2)]

Same form as rotary induction motor torque equation, with thrust replacing torque and linear velocity replacing angular. Power P = F · v.

Maximum thrust at smax = R2' / X — typically 20–40 % slip, much higher than the few-percent slip of rotary IMs. LIMs typically run at 5–30 % slip to balance thrust and efficiency.

End effects — the LIM efficiency penalty

Because the stator is finite in the direction of motion (unlike a rotary IM where the magnetic loop is closed):

Result: LIM efficiency 60–80 %, vs 85–95 % for rotary IM. Mitigations: long pole pitch, end-compensation windings, graded magnetic shielding.

Maglev applications

Urban transit (LIM-driven wheel-on-rail, no maglev)

Many systems use LIM only for propulsion with conventional wheels and rails. Advantages: no traction motors on bogies, robust passive aluminum reaction rail in track center, tolerates steep gradients (no friction-limited traction), quiet operation. Examples:

EMALS — naval aircraft catapult

Ford-class US Navy carriers replaced steam catapults with the Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System: a long-stator LIM along a 100-meter trough accelerates an aircraft from 0 to ~240 km/h in ~2 seconds (~12 g horizontal). Advantages over steam: precise energy control per aircraft, lower thermal stress, faster cycle, smaller plant footprint.

Other industrial uses

LIM vs LSM (Linear Synchronous Motor)

PropertyLIMLSM
RotorPassive conducting sheetPermanent magnets or wound DC field
OperationSlip-driven inductionSynchronous, position-commutated
Efficiency60–80 %85–95 %
Drive complexitySimple open-loop 3-φPosition sensor + controlled inverter
Best forHigh-thrust, low-precision (maglev, EMALS, transit)High-precision (CNC linear servos, wafer steppers)

Tubular LIM

Windings wrapped circumferentially around a cylindrical rod create a tubular LIM — compact linear actuators for industrial automation.

Take-away. Linear induction motor = rotary IM unrolled. v_s = 2·τ·f, slip and thrust analogous to rotary. End effects are the unique LIM penalty, reducing η to 60–80 %. Major applications: maglev (Transrapid, JR-Maglev), urban transit (SkyTrain, KL LRT), EMALS aircraft catapult, roller-coaster launch, liquid-sodium pumps. LSM (synchronous cousin) wins on efficiency / precision; LIM wins on simplicity / cost.